It's wrong to consider +3.00 & -3.00 the same. Plus corrections are  
almost doubly inverse of minus corrections - 1.5x at a very minimum. A  
+3.00 is at least a -5.00 when comparing severity. Just ask any lab as  
to which stock lenses they carry, +4.00/-7.00 to -8.00 is probably  
most common.

Minus corrections are more concerned with edge thickness. Plus lenses  
can get very heavy. I've seen virtually no one happy with a +3.00 or  
above in cr-39, or +3.50 in polycarbonate or above. I've dealt with  
almost 10 optical professionals in 3 states & 2 countries in the past  
ten years. This is the most common mistake i've seen made by  
inexperienced personnel.

J.evan

iPhone

On Jun 1, 2009, at 6:45 AM, clarity <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I would NEVER use cr39 on a RX over +3.00 or -3.00 unless i HAD TO.
> It looks like crap, sorry but like pure crap.It will stick out up to.
> 6.7mm i would consider this to be heavy and ugly.Sorry but just
> because you want to save money doesnt mean you should buy the cheapest
> product available.
> Sorry all lenses have abberations, cr39 in one of the most stable
> materials in this regard.However, unless you have low vision, or are
> unable to be corrected to 6/6 with spectacles you are very unlikley to
> notice the difference in abberations if you go for a high index.
>
> On May 30, 8:52 am, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -4.00 is not that bad. Personally, except for rimless, I would stick
>> with CR39 because of low price, reasonably good thickness, and
>> excellent optical quality.
>>
>> If you're getting plastic frames, CR39 is a complete no-brainer. The
>> frame will hide any lens thickness, and there's no chance of  
>> chromatic
>> aberration. CR39 is probably not suitable for rimless for other
>> reasons than thickness. I would think that it's fine also for metal
>> frames unless you're getting really large ones (50+ mm).
>>
>> Zenni's standard 1.57 "Thin and Light" plastic" (probably the same
>> stuff that other places call by that name) should also work fine with
>> any frame.
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GlassyEyes" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to