EdT wrote: > > > Don't you reckon that using glasses with real frames would circumvent > > all these issues? > > It would, but why offer rimless if they can't produce them properly > and then again their double vision problem exist through out whether > they are semi-rimless or not !
That is true; quality control that fails can fail pretty much anywhere. I wonder whether the double-vision thing is just from having lenses that aren't aligned with each other (basically, a bent bridge) or rather some optical problem with the lenses themselves. Consider aligning them yourself-- gently-- before you give up on them. When I get glasses with flat base curves, I tweak them until they give me identical reflections of distant objects when I look at them. With curved lenses, I tweak them until the reflections in the lenses behave as though they come from the same continuous surface-- that is, as if the two lenses were parts of the same single lens in the way that a reflection rolls across them. This method allows me to align the lenses to within a small fraction of a degree. (The technique might not work for plus prescriptions.) I have to touch up the alignment periodically due to wear and tear, the same way I have to reset my nose pads once in a while, or bend the temples back in because they have spread out a bit. Chalo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GlassyEyes" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
