I also found that they had almost nothing (or maybe absolutely nothing) with a temple of 140 or 145. Can't say if they made a mistake but if they've got bigger frames they're not telling us about, it's there loss I figure.
-- Andrew mailto:[email protected] Saturday, November 7, 2009, 4:39:43 PM, you wrote: > Okay, the G4U site is driving me batty! I'm trying to find my husband > a pair of glasses, and the temple lengths seem improbably short. For > instance, there are tons of glasses with total widths of 138-140 with > temples of 125 or 130, and almost none with temple lengths of anything > above 138. I live chatted, and they assured me that every pair of > glasses had been double checked. > So what gives?? Are they really all super wide compared to temple > length, or have they messed up their measurements?? > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GlassyEyes" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
