thanx for explaining. it was clearer than the man page. so
the way it is in now is better as it produces no warning.
Stéphane Magnenat wrote:
On Saturday 07 January 2006 02:12, Leo Wandersleb wrote:
hi guys
nct just told me i had removed a needed line and left irc
before i could answer.
compiler told me the line was not needed. sorry for
believing my compiler :((
IRC.cpp:280: strtok(NULL, " =");
but what are the required side-effects? Again: I feel
terribly sorry to have caused confusion, but i'd like to know.
man strtok ;-)
More seriously, strtok, when called with a non NULL first parameter, take this
string and return the first token, by adding a trailing 0 at the end of the
token (so in the middle of the input string). When called with NULL, it
continues on the same input string, returning the next token, and put a
trailing 0 at the end of the token (so probably still in the middle of the
input string). So if you remove a strtok, the next strtok will not return the
same token.
This sad, strtok is a bad function because of this side effect thing. It is
thus also non thread-safe.
Steph
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
