On 1/23/06, Matthew Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 21:48, Bradley Arsenault wrote: > > On 1/23/06, Matthew Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think this would feel like an artificial restriction. Towers protected > > > by resources is just a strategical position. > > > > But for stone in particular, unlike any other strategic position, > > theres nothing you can do about it, you can't clear the stone away > > like wood or bash through it like walls, its just there, the > > infalamous wall, hurting you. > > I still see this as a feature :-) > I see it has overcast and easily abused. However its not up to me. But as a last note, if the person on your left rushed and built towers, so you lose around a third of your base. Not a big deal. You rush to defend your other side of your base, to realize he is also building up towers. Teamwork, maybe, quick win, definitly. > MWM > > > _______________________________________________ > glob2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel >
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
