After a little more testing, I found that this all compiles fine on my
gentoo box, using gcc 3.2,3.3,3.4.6.
The way you are using templates does compile on OS X gcc 4.0, but not 3.3.
Could this be an OS X version of gcc issue?
Either way, even if it compiles...
updateGlobalGradientSlow(Uint8 *gradient)
{
if (size <= 65536)
updateGlobalGradientSlow<Uint16>(gradient);
else
updateGlobalGradientSlow<Uint32>(gradient);
}
seems like a very strange and counter-intuitive way of using templates. Was
there a specific reason that it was changed to use templates vs using two
methods?
/Shawn
On 4/2/07, Kai Antweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to make this clear:
> I am not compiling with pedantic and seeing warnings. On OS X and gcc
> 3.3this brings my compiler to a screeching halt (read error).
Yes, that's right. I just wanted much warnings and errors to find
code that compromises portability. I was quite surprised when I
saw the enum error message.
I will follow Cyrilles suggestion and remove -pedantic.
> Can anyone get gcc 3.3 and try it? Maybe gcc 4.x and up support this,
but
> 3.3 doesn't.
I just checked. gcc 3.3.5-r1 is the lowest I can get without problems.
But I don't think I have time until easter.
--
Kai Antweiler
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
