> To conserve bandwidth and space it is best > to avoid dscms completely and use a centralized system like SVN
Maybe if you focus on that point only. We had good reasons not to choose svn and it paid of very well for us that we did take mercurial. Svn had bad merging support back then - I don't know if they have caught up now. When Bradley had to use a computer at a public library for some month, we were really happy that we chose a decentralized system that worked on windows without a need for administrator rights. Also it worked fast and efficient. Also some of us are worried about the power of google. Svn is backed by google for obvious reasons. Mercurial and Bazaar were the control systems that suited us best. > Also, forcing people to re-clone large repositories goes against the idea of > conserving bandwidth. That is true! Steph, you should think about it. We could focus on starting a completely new repository when we reach glob2-1.0 and leave the old one separate as a reference. -- Kai Antweiler _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
