On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Stéphane Magnenat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 26 November 2008 00:12:49 Kai Antweiler wrote: >> You are absolutely right. We ignore the undering concept - as we often do. >> We have only a hand full of active developers. Therefore it isn't that bad. >> >> If some users already have those revisions locally (which is unlikely >> because they aren't in the default branch), it won't hurt. > > As far as I know, updating or cloning the repository does clone everything. So > this is not clean :-(
You are right that cloning a repository essentially creates copies of all of the files that ever existed in the history of a repository. The older files are stored in this directory, I think: .hg/store/data/ (http://hgbook.red-bean.com/hgbookch4.html) Can you explain what is wrong with keeping the object files in the history and spreading them on other people's computers even if they are hidden somewhere in .hg/store/data/? Thanks. -- Michael Ploujnikov http://plouj.com/
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
