On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Numbeast .<[email protected]> wrote: > While looking through the usl code I noticed Usl has no notion of operator > precedence. This means that while executing mathematical expressions such as > 1 + 2 * 3 usl returns values which seem wrong at first glance. Is this an > intentional omision intented to keep the intrepreter clean and simple or is > operator precedence a planned feature?
It's an intentional omission. It could be implemented but I'm not convinced it's worth it. Martin _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
