On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Martin Voelkle<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Numbeast .<[email protected]> wrote: >> While looking through the usl code I noticed Usl has no notion of operator >> precedence. This means that while executing mathematical expressions such as >> 1 + 2 * 3 usl returns values which seem wrong at first glance. Is this an >> intentional omision intented to keep the intrepreter clean and simple or is >> operator precedence a planned feature? > > It's an intentional omission. It could be implemented but I'm not > convinced it's worth it.
Oh, and there is no trivial way to do it: you can define any operator in usl: +-+, %=, etc. I don't even know what their precedence should be. Martin _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
