Hi,

I also used cmake in other projects, and it is sometimes quite hard to debug 
but otherwise works ok. I have little experience with scons, but I was quite 
happy I managed to add out of source build in one hour the other day, so I have 
a good feeling with scons based on that.

I am worried about spending time changing a build system that works very well, 
as this is bikeshedding (https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding). In 
that sense, it does not add real value to the project and wastes energy.

kind regards,

Stéphane

On 30 December 2019 02:17:00 CET, Othniel Graichen <othn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I agree that cmake is the way to go.
>
>On Sun, Dec 29, 2019, 6:23 PM Linus Probert <linus.prob...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Cmake is more or less the standard among c/c++ projects these days.
>Not
>> because it’s the fastest or the easiest. Mainly because it’s the most
>> feature complete build tool. Gnome switched to meson some time back
>but I
>> still find mesons lacking in some areas.
>>
>> If we are going to switch I’d suggest going with cmake. I can take a
>look
>> if your interested.
>>
>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 19:35, Othniel Graichen <othn...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>
>>> Qmake is for qt, right? Does it build with cake now? How about
>visual
>>> studio?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019, 11:57 AM Kyle L <k...@randomvoids.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As part of this pull request
>>>> https://github.com/Globulation2/glob2/pull/6
>>>> Richel is adding support to use qmake instead of scons and gave
>some
>>>> decent reasoning why it's useful to have. I don't have any
>preferences on
>>>> which build tool to use, except that I think we should only use
>one. Having
>>>> to maintain two methods of building the project and introducing
>that as
>>>> another variable when helping people debug compiling issues seems
>like a
>>>> bad idea.
>>>>
>>>> Since I haven't touched c++ build tools in quite some time, what
>are you
>>>> guys' thoughts? scons, cmake, qmake, something else? or support
>multiple?
>>>>
>>>> Kyle
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> glob2-devel mailing list
>>>> glob2-devel@nongnu.org
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> glob2-devel mailing list
>>> glob2-devel@nongnu.org
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> glob2-devel mailing list
>> glob2-devel@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
>>

--
http://stephane.magnenat.net
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
glob2-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel

Reply via email to