http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg3/176.htm

"In principle, only ~10^5t of such mesh structures are required to
achieve the benchmark 1% increase in albedo."

http://www.ucalgary.ca/~keith/papers/26.Keith.2000.GeoengineeringHistoryandProspect.e.pdf

"Teller et al (8) note that a scattering system at the L1 point need
only deflect
light through the small angle required for it to miss the earth, about
0.01 rad as
compared to 1 rad for scatterers in near earth orbit or in the
stratosphere. For appropriately designed scattering systems, such as
the metal mesh described above,
the reduced angular deflection requirement allows the mass of the
system to decrease
by the same ratio. Thus, while a shield at the L1 point requires
roughly
the same area as a near-earth shield, its mass can be 102 times
smaller. Teller
et al estimate the required mass at 10^3 tonnes."

To answer your question: Why not just reduce the emissions of
greenhouse gases?

If that costs $500 billion per year to achieve the same effect, and the
alternative is $50 billion, I'd have a fairly straightforward answer.

And how about the notion that some nations, say China and India, might
just refuse to participate in greenhouse gas reductions, with a
complete and utter unwillingness not to burn their coal?

It surely is worthwhile investigating the possibilities in depth. What
harm would a bit of research do?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change.

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to