"william" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
> James Annan wrote:
> > An interesting comment:
> >
> >
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-yohe0630.artjun30,0,7395459.sto
ry
>
> Clearly not that interesting :-)
>
> Anyway, yes indeed, if you are going to react to 1% events there will
> be a lot of things to react to. I suspect that the 1% doctrine is more
> an excuse to do things for little justification, and won't be extended
> to inconvenient areas.
Clearly. The list of one percent threats in the national security arena
must be quite long, and easily extendable. So just pick however you want to
preemptively attack based on all those other good reasons...
Coby
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
