Alastair McDonald wrote:

> James, what levels of CO2 do you think we should not exceed, bearing in
> mind that at 380 ppm the Greenland ice sheet is already starting to melt,
> hurricanes are starting to intensify, and forest fires are raging throughout
> the world?

I think that under any reasonably comprehensive assessment of global 
change, the AGW-induced change will, in the long term, be close to 
logarithmic in the concentration of CO2 (assuming some rough 
stabilisation). I don't have much idea for an "optimal" trajectory of 
CO2 into the future given the various competing demands, but I do think 
that it would be sensible to work significantly harder towards limiting 
emissions than we are currently doing. Personally, I would start with a 
revenue-neutral carbon tax, which seems like a complete no-brainer which 
would steer the market in the right direction without the need for 
excessive red tape and regulation. If I were king for a day, I'd do that 
within the UK even without international co-operation, as I am sure that 
the long-term benefits (eg energy efficiency/independence, development 
of world-leader status in new technology) would be substantial. But 
unfortunately the concept of a "new tax" (even one that simply replaces 
old taxes) is electoral suicide given a brain-dead electorate and 
dishonest media.

I see no sign, or even hint, or even hypothesis, which supports the 
claim of "a step change in the rate of global warming" at 440ppm or any 
other level, which is the quote with which I started this thread. But 
maybe in 1000 years, Greenland will be green and Londoners will have gills.

James

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to