My question: Why do public figures speaking on climate change seldom mention the nuclear imperative, when even the least nuclear-intensive stabilization scenario in the Third Assessment Report called for a six-fold increase in nuclear generating capacity by 2100?
-dl ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change To: "globalchange" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:52 PM Subject: [Global Change: 1301] Ask a climate change expert about the IPCC Report > > Richard Moss is taking your questions about climate change and the > Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)! <snip.> > Click here (sorry for the long URL) to post a question today! > http://www.thepeoplespeak.org/community.igloo?r0=community&r0_script=/scripts/folder/viewmore.script&r0_pathinfo=%2F%7B78d4a4ef-9401-49f9-bb92-c09b114ee798%7D%2FForums%2Fthepeopl%2Faskane~1%2Faskricha&r0_start=0&r0_count=10&r0_output=xml&s=cc&#{9C94C425-C471-48B2-83A5-8EE8C6E0B7ED}_end > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
