On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Michael Tobis wrote: > Consequently, some blazingly obvious things worth doing (continuing to > maintain existing lengthy observation series, for instance) are often left > undone. They are undone because it is in nobody's personal interest to > promote them, despite the fact that it is very much in the common interest > that they be done.
Its much less clear that maintaining so many sfc stations is a good idea. Europe is way over-dense for what you need for climate; and they aren't needed for NWP any more. Fairly soon they won't be needed for climate either... -W. William M Connolley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/ Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | (01223) 221479 -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
