Hi, Ivaylo, First, I hope you don't mind me suggesting that you get a bit of help on your English language translation of your work: at the moment, it is a bit hard to read.
On your suggestion of translocating icebergs to deserts, I am not sure this is practicable, either mechanically or economically. How do you imagine we could move a melting iceberg across a continent to where the desert is? What would happen to the iceberg once it got there? (Evaporation?) Ask yourself why the deserts are there in the first place? What has caused this area of the land surface to become desert? And then consider what changes might be expected to occur in these parts of the world under a GW scenario: are they expected to become hotter or colder, wetter or drier? It is reassuring to think that there might be a geoengineering solution to our problems, but these, at best, could only ever be short- term, temporary solutions to immediate, local problems. I suspect that the entire system you are trying to adjust is a lot more complicated than your ideas suggest. On 23 Apr, 08:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My name is Ivaylo Avramov and I'd like to introduce you one vision > about how to tackle Climate Change consequences, as part of a bigger > Economic Development mechanism. > > So far we were fighting global problems one by one - no matter whether > we discuss the Global Warming, the water scarcity, the Poverty, the > problems in free trade, the AIDS, the illiteracy and religious > fanaticism leading to terror and violence, etc. My point is: Don't you > think that we need to change the approach? > > I am conducting a research in the field of climate change (and what we > could do to adapt to it). The study has multiple scientific, social, > economic and political aspects. > The details are available athttp://www.deserticeproject.com > > There you will find a description of the project aimed to fight global > warming (and many other related global problems like desertification / > drought, food and water shortage, poverty, etc.) by global, complex > measures. > > The emphasis is on the belief that basically we can react to climate > change in two key ways: once - by intensive greening (more trees and > leafs - more absorbed CO2, as well as more jobs, more income and > profits, more stable economies and more well living people, etc.), > twice - by sophisticated filtering and energy efficient systems not > allowing heat-trapping gases to flow in the atmosphere. > > I believe that this might be interesting for you from your > perspective, and that the proposed measures could initiate a serious > discussion. > > Thank you in advance for any opinion, criticism or additional info. > Looking forwards to hearing from you. > > best regards, > I.Avramov --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
