On May 6, 12:50 pm, John A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 6, 1:09 pm, Hoggle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So, for example, we could expect that a gratuitous posting comparing
> > > "The Great Global Warming Swindle" to denial of the Japanese bombing
> > > Pearl Harbor
> > > would fall foul of this rule?
>
> > Slightly misses the point. The moderation is a minority rule system,
> > where any ONE moderator may deem a post acceptable. It won't matter if
> > all the others regard it as appaling bigotted nonsense, if one
> > moderator thought it was a valid contribution, it would be passed.
>
> I think the problem is that the best scientific posts in the world
> cannot ennoble
> vile contributions by people like Coppock.
>
> So I don't propose to continue the conversation at this venue.
>
> Coppock can call it a victory, for what its worth.
I notice that you, aka John A, have a curious profile. Only 3
messages, all complaining about moderated groups.
Vile posts? I wonder if your would clue us in to the names you have
previously posted under so we could see the sort of posts you might
want to place on globalchange?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
