> The role of scientists is not limited to pure science. There are
> social and ethical responsibilities.

You are certainly right about that. Still, most government
organisations have, I believe, a mandate to be policy neutral, which I
understand as meaning that they provide facts, but not political
advocacy. How that's to be interpreted is another matter, but the
basic principle that objective facts and subjective opinion should be
separated out, as far as possible, seems eminently sensible.

There is a big grey area there, eg think of one of your pet concerns,
namely the assumptions that go into economic models.

I understand that we are adapted to the present climate, and that
climate has been stable for a long time, so any change comes at our
peril, and I've commented extensively on both points fairly recently
here, eg
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange/msg/ff2d74d601ef5ce5

Economic models, depending on the assumptions you feed them, in the
peer reviewed literature do include negative damages in their range
(see the paper by Tol I quoted earlier), so believing that modest
climate change may be beneficial is not nearly as outlandish as some
people here seem to think.

Let me say one final thing about Griffin. Looking at his CV, climate
change is not at all his speciality and it seems to me that he got
asked his personal opinion here. I also think that Griffin accepts the
IPCC consensus on the climate science, but when it comes to questions
like the value of eco-systems for their own sake, or whether
developing world farmers can be sensibly asked to do other jobs in the
future, and for their food to be imported from a Siberia or Canada
with large scale water projects to deal with both droughts/floods, I'd
suspect he'd make similar value decisions and/or let's call it
"guesses about the future of a complex system like human societies and
the world's eco-systems that cannot be made on an entirely rational
basis due to too little being known about them" than I'd make myself.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to