I think that if there is a clear and serious mandate for carbon sequestration as a condition of the subsidy it is a very very good idea. If there isn't such a mandate it is a very very bad one.
Risky business that may require a more mature political process than we can muster. Most greenies aren't being helpful at all. see http://initforthegold.blogspot.com/2007/06/coal-thing.html and an article linked from there by Kevin Vranes at Prometheus. mt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
