----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Annan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.general.global-change
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:33 AM
Subject: [Global Change: 1837] Re: breaking the population bomb taboo

>
> Zeke Hausfather wrote:
>> Coercive population control programs
>> are rarely very successful, with China's one child policy standing out
>> as the major exception (and, frankly, a similar program would be
>> impossible to implement in a democracy, as "the emergency" in India so
>> clearly showed.
>
> Coercive carbon taxes are rarely very successful, in fact there are no
> major exceptions I can think of (and, frankly, a similar program would
> be impossible to implement in a democracy, as the "fuel tax protests" in
> the UK so clearly showed).
>
> :-)
>
> James

Clever turn-about, James.  Policies to reduce carbon emissions are deemed 
acceptable while policies to reduce baby emissions are taboo.  I believe the 
taboo to be rooted in a value judgment as regards death by toxic shock 
following forced insertion of intrauterine devices, versus nicking drivers a 
few pence at the petrol pump.

Putting the issues on a more equal footing, some population control interest 
groups in the US tried to introduce a tax policy regarding family size a few 
years back.  They wanted to repeal the incremental income tax exemptions for 
additional children after the second.  This prompted one demographer to 
comment "The image of the paterfamilias in, say, Rwanda, filling out his tax 
form and worrying about his deductions is too bizarre to contemplate." (Paul 
Demeny "An Economist's Use for Sand" - a review of Garret Hardins' _The 
Ostrich Factor:  Our Population Myopia_ in _Nature_, 7 October 1999, p 528).

-dl 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to