Michael Tobis wrote:
> Hey, I'm just reporting.
> 
> The guy was obviously mathematically sphisticated and a professional
> statistician, but I couldn't really see how he could get any results
> that don't violate his philosophy.

Well getting back to the origins of this sub-thread there would be no 
problem in saying that for their particular experiment, 90% of the large 
impacts originated from the event they simulated (with the rest coming 
from the natural background). That's a perfectly ordinary frequentist 
approach, and in fact this is precisely what they calculated.

> I was amazed to see that this is a real controversy in some circles.

Well, a lot of scientists (myself included) were brought up on a diet of 
purely frequentist probability, and many of them also seem to be 
uncomfortable with the idea of subjectivity in scientific judgements. 
Hence uniform priors being defined as "ignorance" (where "ignorance" is 
circularly defined as the state of mind described by a uniform 
distribution...) and other such drivel.

But I hope this particular horse can be considered well thrashed now. 
I'm going to a workshop on probability in climate science in a couple of 
weeks, which several other climate scientists are slated to attend, so 
it will be interesting to see if and how their thinking has progressed 
in the 2 years(!) since I started talking about this sort of thing.

James

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to