> ... there is no real need to give the Idsos or Motl more attention
> than they deserve.
Absolutely!
Regarding the point made in an earlier post on this thread, I would
certainly expect CO2 to follow orbital forcings on the way back down
from an interglacial maximum.
Another sink for CO2 at the maximum is the increased volume of the
upper portion of the ocean, about 4 meter sea stand rise for the
Eemian. I don't know how important that is.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
