Phil Hays wrote:
> On Dec 28, 9:07 am, Tom Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The value of a human life is around 10 million these days.
>>
>> Based on that, I figure that we can't justify spending 500 billion to
>> avoid extinction in 591 years. Sometime around July 4th, 2598 to be
>> exact.
>
> I'm greatly reminded of a calculation Mark Twain published on the
> length of the Mississippi river. Any sum compounded at a any positive
> rate of return will eventually exceed any fixed value. So?
>
> It is not worth spending US$0.01 to prevent extinction in year X. Year
> X will depend on the rate of return and the stated value of human
> species. at US$6*10^16
The basic point that all of these calculations (including paying for
mitigation of GHG emissions) tend to omit is that the choice is not
between paying now, and extinction, but between paying now, and
revisiting the question tomorrow, when another decision to pay or not
can be made.
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
