At 12:53 PM 1/9/2008, sploo.laroo (Eric) wrote:
>okc,
>
>I think it may be helpful to explain why the IPCC is a good place for
>you to go to address your question.

Here is another discussion of why the IPCC should not be
dismissed:

http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2007/02/02/dessler/index.html

You're Getting Warmer

The scoop on the new IPCC climate-change report

By 
<http://www.grist.org/cgi-bin/search.pl?query=gristauthor=%28Andrew%20Dessler%29&reverse=on&sort=gristdate>Andrew
 
Dessler
02 Feb 2007

[Here are some excerpts:]

What is the IPCC, and what's the deal with its new report?

When climate change emerged as an important environmental issue in 
the late 1980s, the world governments' first response was to 
establish an international body to produce summaries of scientific 
knowledge of climate change. That body is the Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change. The IPCC has completed three major reports since 
its formation, in 1990, 1995, and 2001, and throughout 2007 will 
release its Fourth Assessment Report (hereafter referred to as the AR4).

...

The IPCC reports are widely regarded as the authoritative statements 
of scientific knowledge about climate change, and as such they carry 
enormous weight in both the scientific and policy communities. The 
immense credibility of the IPCC's reports arises from the credible 
process that produces it. The reports are based on the peer-reviewed 
literature and are written by hundreds of expert climate scientists 
from over 100 countries. The reports then go through multiple layers 
of review, including expert peer review by thousands of climate 
scientists who were not authors of the report.

The IPCC's Third Assessment Report, published in 2001, then went 
through review by a blue-ribbon panel convened by the U.S. National 
Academy of Sciences, which endorsed its findings. The conclusions of 
the IPCC reports have also been endorsed by the American Geophysical 
Union, the American Meteorological Society, the American Association 
for the Advancement of Science, and others.

The resulting IPCC reports are accepted worldwide as the best 
summaries of what the scientific community knows about climate change 
and how confidently we know it.

[Visit the website for the complete article]

Andrew Dessler is an associate professor in the Department of 
Atmospheric Sciences at Texas A&M University; his research focuses on 
the physics of climate change, climate feedbacks in particular. He 
blogs at <http://gristmill.grist.org/user/Andrew%20Dessler>Gristmill.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to