I'm not a scientist, but a journalist, so maybe I shouldn't comment on this 
string.  
   
  Nevertheless, I wonder about the legitimacy of the word "irrefutably" in this 
challenge.
   
  Given the way scientists think about the world, is ANY theory ever 
"irrefutably" proven?  
  I don't think so.  
   
  I think even the most respected and generally accepted scientific theories 
are only provisionally "proven" -- are seen as supported by the preponderance 
of the data, until some brash scientitic pest like a Copernicus or a Newton 
comes up with a new paradigm.
   
  My sense of the AGW controversy is that the preponderance of the evidence 
supports the notion of "anthopogenic" GW, but not that most climate scientists 
are 100% convinced of the truth of this theory -- or any other theory, for that 
matter.  
   
  That's why the IPCC in its periodic reports has expressed an increasing 
confidence in AGW theory - but without saying that their conclusions are 
"irrefutable."  
   
  Whatever uncertainties may or may not exist over AGW, I think chemist is 
demanding an impossible standard of proof in his challenge.. 

okc chemist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
I defy anyone to prove to me that "global warming" is irrefutably a
predominantly anthropogenic process. The scientific method does not
get you there, true facts on A.G.W. are few and far between. Please do
not give me links to environmental activist sites like Real Climate. I
said irrefutable evidence, not politics.

I want to see where a debate on global warming can go if we
use ....just the facts, Madam. If the members here are too eaten up
with politics to scientifically and intelligently discuss the issue,
just ignore this post.




       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to