On Apr 2, 4:49 pm, "David B. Benson" wrote:
> ... Back to the drawing board.
Wasn't that hard to fix. I'll define SCCS as the 5 year response of a
GCM to an instantaneous doubline of CO2. That's about 60% of ECS;
with ECS = 3 K, SCCS is about 1.8 K, less than TCS and resolves the
need, claimed by Tung et al. to raise TCS.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
