On Apr 2, 7:30 pm, "David B. Benson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> Wasn't that hard to fix. ...
Better fix is to correctly state the conclusions
===========
(4) Conclusion.
Papers [1,4] determine a value for SCCS which is too high. Paper [3]
determines a value for SCCS which is too low. There is no reason to
raise (or lower) the current best estimate of ECS, close to 3 K.
===========
Thanks to William C. for the comments and questions.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
