This is not a new objection, here it is almost 6 years ago:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony/
I suppose Lindzen may have responded to this objection, since it has
been around for a while, but I can't find his response.
This article implies that Lindzen thinks that a higher-than-expected
albedo forcing of the ice sheets could be the source of the extra
forcing required. Or is it a straw man who thinks that? Not sure.
Also the article implies that Lindzen (or a straw man) thinks it was
not so cold as most climatologists think it was during the glacials.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
