Robert, my point was that I did actually try to understand both papers and wrote a reply which was published in E&E, not just a rant posted on some blog to be forever lost in the shuffle. Perhaps you noticed the note at the end of Loehle's second paper, thanking me and others for our contribution in finding his errors. Have you taken the time to read my comments or Gavin Schmidt's RealClimate post?
E. S. ------------------------------- Robert I Ellison wrote: > Both the original and correction are in the Sunday School link? > I don't know what you're point is? > On Feb 25, 6:45 am, Eric Swanson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Robert, > > > > Well then, where's the reference to the RealClimate post about > > Loehle's 2007 paper? > > And where's the reference to my commentary in E&E regarding Loehle's > > 2008 "correction", a paper which was actually a new analysis??? > > > > Comments on Loehle, "Correction To: A 2000-Year Global Temperature > > Reconstruction Based on Non-Tree Ring Proxies", E&E, 18 (7 and 8), > > 2007, Energy & Environment, Volume 19, Number 5, September 2008, pp. > > 771-773(3) > > DOI: 10.1260/095830508784815964 > > > > E. S. > --- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
