Dear David, I merely and mildly pointed out to Jason that his interpretation of the theory was incorrect.
So is yours if you think there is enough evidence to confirm or refute this theory. I think the discussion in 4AR is balanced if a little lacking in detail. Cheers Robert On Mar 10, 9:52 am, "David B. Benson" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 9, 2:07 pm, Robert I Ellison <[email protected]> > wrote:> ... less cosmic rays = less berylium 10 and fewer cloud nucleation > > sites > > That's not even known for sure. In any case it is irrelevant; > everywhere but possibly in the interior of Antarctica (where it > doesn't matter) there is a superabundance of CCNs. This means that a > few more or a few less CNs (which may never grow into CCNs anyway) is > not a controller on cloud formation. > > It shouldn't tke you long to find the handful of papers which > establish what I stated in the prior paragraph. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
