On Mar 11, 12:45 pm, Robert I Ellison <[email protected]>
wrote:
> ...
> So is yours if you think there is enough evidence to confirm or refute
> this theory.
See at least two threads on RealClimate. Since then
there have been additional papers establishing
the density of CCNs.
> I think the discussion in 4AR is balanced if a little
> lacking in detail.
IPCC AR4 is in this regard, as in all others, overly
conservative. In any case in many portions it is
already out-of-date.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
