Despite my progressive tendencies (rather than because of them), I'm
more or less with you for the first four paragraphs (ignoring a few
technical issues). But where you say:
> Given the diversity of technological
> approaches to the problem – a global aspirational goal of net zero
> greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, without higher energy costs, lower
> growth and greater restraint on human development, is possible ...
> It involves
> more global, public funding of research and development – in
> technologies that serve rather then diminish legitimate human
> development goals ...
Are you certain that the former will lead to the latter? Or are you
merely hoping that it is so?
-Eric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
