Try this one for daily temps - and compare for at least this century -
heaps of fun.  Unlike you guys.  2010 was trending to be the warmest
ever.

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/

Have a look at this one -   a very pretty picture - a big, big La Nina
in the central Pacific and a planet cooling off.  Frigid, nutrient
rich and quite acidic water rising from the briny depths in the
Humboldt Current.  I predict a huge increase in biological
productivity across the Pacific.

http://www.osdpd.noaa.gov/data/sst/anomaly/2010/anomnight.9.16.2010.gif

I hesitate to link to Roy Spencer but it is the monthly data that is
most relevant to ENSO.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/

Global temp peaked in July and can't go anywhere but down.

I just heard on the radio this morning that Arctic ice extent this
year was the third lowest.

You might tell Eric that the definition of climate as the average of
weather is the one the IPCC promotes.

http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-1-2.html

All your link does is show forcing increasing over the decades.  So
what?  There is not a scintilla of methodology.  I am supposed to
accept this on faith?

All there here is a bogging down in detail that is approximate when
not totally misleading, totally uncalled for, but typical, taunts of
rants, accusation of failure to understand something as simple as that
the world is as warm as it has been for at least a thousand years,
bald decalaration of nonsense, a failure to discuss (elided) any of
the issues, accusations that I failed to respond when clearly I
discussed aerosols in  the context of the logical requirement for
completeness in even a moderately cogent argument.

Overall - a lamentable failure to see the big picture.

'The ideal integration of changes of atmospheric composition and cloud
cover on radiant flux balance is of course the satellite TOA data.
This indicates that cloud cover changes - associated with ENSO - is
the major cause of ocean and atmosphere warming in the satellite era.
CERES - Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System - since 1999 shows a
similar effect.  The satellites actually show cooling in the LW.  The
IPCC argues that the satellite record is inconsistent with surface
cloud observations.  Which is not correct - at least for cloud in the
most important areas of the Pacific.'  Amy Clement and colleagues did
a fairly recent study collating cloud observations in the Pacific -
they called it a positive global warming feedback.

http://isccp.giss.nasa.gov/projects/browse_fc.html
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch3s3-4-4-1.html

Study the NESDIS NOAA SST anomaly linked to above and combine it with
an understanding of the state of the ocean indices below - and you
might just get an appreciation of natural variation.

http://ioc-goos-oopc.org/state_of_the_ocean/

The world is full of fools and charlatans - defined here as post
modernist types who have forgotten in their hubris, or never ever
understood, the need for an appropriate intellectual openness and
modesty.

On Sep 17, 11:53 am, "David B. Benson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 6:43 pm, "David B. Benson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> Well, maybe 2010 will be right up near the top for
> global temperature:
> "NASA reports hottest January to August on 
> record"http://climateprogress.org/2010/09/12/nasahottest-january-to-august-o...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to