----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

Mike,

The numbering went like this:  #9 was NC28654,  #10 NC141 (later N141E), 
#11 NC28655 (?),  #12 NC142,  #13 NC143, #14 unknown, and #15 28920.
Later 
on ERCO registered them sequentially in blocks from 50 up to 1,500.
Expect 
when an aircraft was sold for export before receiving an N-number they are

sequential once you get to #15. Forney, Alon, and Mooney registered them
in 
other than perfect order.

I wouldn't go against anybody saying 28655 was number 11, but I would like

a little more data before I say it.

NC-15692 is number 1.  It is now on loan (owned ?) the Nation Air and
Space 
Museum.  I haven't seen anything about NX-15962.

Do you know anything about the two plywood Coupes that are rumored to have

been made in 1942?

Richard.


At 11:50 AM 4/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
>----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any

>advice in this forum.]----
>
>Thanks Richard,
>
>I have the same info regarding the AAC serial number of 41-18875 and that
it
>never did receive AAC colors.
>
>If #9 was NC28654, and #11 was likely 655, what was the registration on
#10?
>Were these planes no necessarily sequentially registered?
>
>My letter from the Smithsonian also says this: "As a matter if interest,
>one other ERCO 415 was apparently evaluated at Wright Field, Ohio
(NX-15692)
>but this aircraft was apparently not acquired by the USAAC. It was a
rather
>common practice in the Pre-WW2 period for manufacturers to offer their
new
>designs to the officials at Wright Field for semi-official "evaluation"
at
>the manufacturer's expense, and this was almost certainly such an
instance."
>
>Does anyone know anything about this airframe? (NX-15692)
>
>Mike Dean
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>In regard to your question about YO-15 (NC28655), I have only been able
to
>confirm some of the details.  NC28655 had the AAC serial number of
41-18875
>and was taken into service at Wright (Wright-Patterson) on 2/26/41.  The
>aircraft was flown to March field and return to Wright (confirmed by
>JPL).  It was transferred to "class 26" (non-flying, training status) on
>10/6/41.    The ACC records show it had 182.6 hours of ACC use when it
was
>transferred to class 26.  It is interesting to note that the ACC records
do
>not show it being transferred to March at any time.  I assume it was on
>loan to March.
>
>Unconfirmed:  Some say it was serial number 11 which would have been a
>1940.  I have a request in now to verify its serial number.  Serial
number
>9 was N28654,  #'s 10, 12, 13 are accounted for and belonged to the CAA
>(FAA).  Serial number 14 has not been identified.  It seems very likely
>that serial number 11 carried 28655.  I would assume since it was still
in
>civilian colors in August that it was never painted AAC colors.
>
>The other two AAC Coupes (PQ-13) are a bigger question.  They are said to
>be serial numbers 110 and 111, but some of the story is not clear.  I am
>again waiting on verification on their serial numbers.
>
>Richard
>N99904
>www27.brinkster.com/n99904
>

Richard Wilkens
Director of Institutional Research
Western State College
970-943-7010

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiLm.aVzvvT
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to