On 23 Jan 2015, at 12:43, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavu...@redhat.com> wrote:
<snip>
> We implemented two approaches,  (1) and (2i) to get some
> performance numbers. The setup was 4*2 distributed-replicated volume
> using ram disks as bricks to avoid hard disk bottleneck. And the numbers
> are attached with the mail.

Awesome. :)

"2i" seems like a pretty clear win.  Is the code that you used for this in
Gerrit, so people can look over it as well? :)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to