On 02/09/2015 09:30 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > On 23 Jan 2015, at 12:43, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavu...@redhat.com> wrote: > <snip> >> We implemented two approaches, (1) and (2i) to get some >> performance numbers. The setup was 4*2 distributed-replicated volume >> using ram disks as bricks to avoid hard disk bottleneck. And the numbers >> are attached with the mail. > Awesome. :) > > "2i" seems like a pretty clear win. Is the code that you used for this in > Gerrit, so people can look over it as well? :)
I have pushed a patch [1] after addressing first comment by Avati. [1] : http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9506/ Rafi KC > > Regards and best wishes, > > Justin Clift > > -- > GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org > > An open source, distributed file system scaling to several > petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. > > My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
