On 08/05/2015 07:01 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
Indeed , no feedback on QA releases happens between minor versions.
I do think , there is no point to keep alpha/beta releases between
minor versions , but we can do that for Major as Kaleb mentioned.
--Humble
+1
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com
<mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 08/05/2015 08:45 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 05:57 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
>> Hi Ragavendra,
>>
>> How many beta releases hit for each minor release ? and the gap
>> between these releases ?
>>
>> --Humble
>>
>
> I am not sure about the beta releases. As per my understanding
there are
> no beta releases happening in release-3.5 branch and also the latest
> release-3.7 branch. I was doing beta releases for release-3.6
branch.
> But I am also thinking of moving away from it and make 3.6.5
directly
> (and also future release-3.6 releases).
We get zero feedback from alphas and betas. Nobody has complained
about
the lack of them.
IMO we should still to alpha and beta for x.y.0 releases though.
--
Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel@gluster.org>
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
