Original patch was proper, wondering which patch introduced this issue.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9503/13/glusterfs.spec.in
Fixed now: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12577 and
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12578/
regards
Aravinda
On 11/12/2015 12:31 PM, Milind Changire wrote:
They are indeed part of the geo-rep sub package ... the package listing (rpm
-qlp) says so.
But I guess if somebody attempts a server build without geo-replication
then the gfind_missing_files will get appended to the %files ganesha
section which is defined just above the %files geo-replication section.
This needs to be corrected to push the gfind_missing_files inside the
%{!?_without_georeplication:1} section under the %files geo-replication
section.
Need to get gfind_missing_files package ownership confirmed from Aravinda.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <[email protected]>
wrote:
the in-tree glusterfs.spec(.in) has them immediately following the
geo-rep sub-package, but outside the %if ... %endif.
Are they part of geo-rep? Or something else?
--
Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
