On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Vijay Bellur <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/19/2016 02:38 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal >> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Amye, >> >>> >> >>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs >> >>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project >> under >> >>> review.gluster.org <http://review.gluster.org> >> >>> >> >>> --Humble >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Currently on the gluster.org <http://gluster.org> website, >> we're directing the 'Suggest a >> >>>> feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'. >> >>>> >> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features >> >>>> >> >>>> In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should >> this go? >> >>>> Let me know and I'll fix it. >> >>>> - amye >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Amye Scavarda | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | >> Gluster Community Lead >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >> >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >>> >> >>> >> >> Said another way, if you wanted to be able to have someone >> contribute a >> >> feature idea, what would be the best way? >> >> Bugzilla? A google form? An email into the -devel list? >> >> >> > >> > If it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE. >> If the user >> > requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community >> devs >> > should file a bug for it. >> > If it is a proposal for a feature with design >> details/implementation ideas >> > then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged. >> >> >> In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal to >> get the attention of all concerned. >> >> -Vijay >> >> >> So should this stay on the website in the first place? >> - amye >> >> > Yes, the relevant workflow needs to be in the website. In the absence of > that, newcomers to the community might find it difficult to understand our > workflow. Currently it is <h5> <a href='http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features'> <i class='fa fa-fw fa-comment'></i> Suggest a feature! </a> </h5> which points to old wiki. Would it be better to have <a href="mailto: [email protected]?subject=Feature Proposal">Suggest a feature</a> there? Thanks, Raghavendra Talur > > > -Vijay > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
