On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Aravinda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > regards > Aravinda > > On 05/19/2016 12:37 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Vijay Bellur <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 05/19/2016 02:38 AM, Amye Scavarda wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Vijay Bellur < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Raghavendra Talur >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal >>> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Amye, >>> >>> >>> >>> afaict, the feature proposal has start from glusterfs-specs >>> >>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/q/project:glusterfs-specs) project >>> under >>> >>> review.gluster.org < <http://review.gluster.org> >>> http://review.gluster.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> --Humble >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Amye Scavarda <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Currently on the gluster.org < <http://gluster.org> >>> http://gluster.org> website, >>> we're directing the 'Suggest a >>> >>>> feature' to the old mediawiki site for 'Features'. >>> >>>> >>> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features >>> >>>> >>> >>>> In an ideal world, this would go somewhere else. Where should >>> this go? >>> >>>> Let me know and I'll fix it. >>> >>>> - amye >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Amye Scavarda | <[email protected]>[email protected] <mailto: >>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> | >>> Gluster Community Lead >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Said another way, if you wanted to be able to have someone >>> contribute a >>> >> feature idea, what would be the best way? >>> >> Bugzilla? A google form? An email into the -devel list? >>> >> >>> > >>> > If it is more of a request from a user it should a bugzilla RFE. >>> If the user >>> > requested on -devel list without a bug, then one of the community >>> devs >>> > should file a bug for it. >>> > If it is a proposal for a feature with design >>> details/implementation ideas >>> > then a patch to glusterfs-specs is encouraged. >>> >>> >>> In any case opening a discussion on gluster-devel would be ideal to >>> get the attention of all concerned. >>> >>> -Vijay >>> >>> >>> So should this stay on the website in the first place? >>> - amye >>> >>> >> Yes, the relevant workflow needs to be in the website. In the absence of >> that, newcomers to the community might find it difficult to understand our >> workflow. > > > Currently it is > <h5> > <a href='http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features > '> > <i class='fa fa-fw fa-comment'></i> > Suggest a feature! > </a> > </h5> > > which points to old wiki. > > Would it be better to have > <a href="mailto: [email protected]?subject=Feature > Proposal">Suggest a feature</a> > there? > > Makes sense. Is it possible to send mail to this list without > registration? or moderator can verify the feature mail from unsubscribed > user and allow? > I did not think of this. I will let someone who knows how mailman works reply. > > Thanks, > Raghavendra Talur > >> >> >> -Vijay >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing > [email protected]http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
