On 08/10/2012 12:02 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
From: "Joe Julian" <[email protected]>
If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think it
shouldn't be in the gluster rpms.
Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---
When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I don't think we
know, do we?
And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to glusterfs?
We are working on getting the changes into upstream Swift sources. Once
the changes are in, the probability of associated changes to glusterfs
being necessary is very low.
In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of extra RPMs.
Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a convenient way.
Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a heartbeat
because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at that point.
Thoughts?
Sounds good to me.
-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
