It would be interesting to compare against -
http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/GlusterFS_1.3.pre2-VERGACION_vs_Lustre-1.4.9.1_Various_Benchmarks
Ian
On 08/04/2010 15:30, Burnash, James wrote:
I'm actually working on this as we speak.
Stay tuned.
James
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kali Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device
(when there is actually lots of free space)
Hi Ron,
Thanks for your suggestion, I might take a look on Ceph.
However, while looking for a good alternative on Glusterfs, I found that
the most mature, widely used and well documented alternative is Lustre.
It seems pretty cool and the only drawback is having to compile kernel
modules (which some times is just not an option).
Did anyone made a good benchmark between Lustre and Gluster?
-kali-
El 08/04/2010 10:14, Ronald Pottol escribió:
Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready
either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will
handle things better than gluster.
home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/
wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page
Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2
I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them.
keep us informed,
Ron
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the
original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender
therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its
discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications.
http://www.knight.com
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
