At the moment, we're not doing auto-failover (it is on the todo list, but it isn't something we've had a chance to look into in depth yet).
-----Original Message----- From: Miles Fidelman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 17 February 2012 7:30 AM To: Thomas Jackson Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] question re. current state of art/practice - follow-up A quick follow-up question: Thomas Jackson wrote: > > We set up a 4 node cluster using Gluster with KVM late last year - > which has been running along quite nicely for us. > <snip> > > I'd definitely say this approach at least worth a look for anyone > building a small VM cluster. Gluster is still a bit too immature for > me to be 100% happy with it, but I think it's going to be perfect in 6 > months time. At the moment, it is fine to use in production with a bit > of care and knowledge of the limitations. > Are you doing any kind of auto-failover, and if so how do you have that set up? Thanks, Miles -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra -- Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering. http://www.mailguard.com.au _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
