It's only "far from good" for certain use cases, not all. I'm actually
quite pleased that GlusterFS emphasizes C & P over A and none of my
users complain ( I use raw images for 14 kvm vms on one of my GlusterFS
volumes ). Those VMs mount GlusterFS volumes for their application data.
Very little is done on the raw image.
Not everybody that uses virtualization is going to be marketing those
VMs to 3rd parties that expect it to pretend to be an isolated system.
On 08/24/2012 01:58 AM, Fernando Frediani (Qube) wrote:
Vijay, how are you planning to integrate Gluster with oVirt (a fantastic idea
in my opinion) if the performance when running .qcow2 or even .raw files is far
from good at the moment ?
Fernando
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
