On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:06:51 -0400 Whit Blauvelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > [...] > > If you're lucky you reach something like 1/3 of the NFS > > performance. > [Gluster NFS Client] > Whit There is a reason why one would switch from NFS to GlusterFS, and mostly it is redundancy. If you start using a NFS-client type you cut yourself off the "complete solution". As said elsewhere you can as well export GlusterFS via kernel-nfs-server. But honestly, it is a patch. It would be better by far if things are done right, native glusterfs client in kernel-space. And remember, generally there should be no big difference between NFS and GlusterFS with bricks spread over several networks - if it is done how it should be, without userspace. -- MfG, Stephan _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
