Well, I would say there is a reason, if the Gluster client performed as 
expected.
Using the Gluster client it should in theory access the file(s) directly from 
the nodes where they reside and not having to go though a single node exporting 
the NFS folder which would then have to gather the file.
Yes the NFS has all the caching stuff but if the Gluster client behaviour was  
similar it should be able to get similar performance which doesn't seem to be 
what has been resported.
I did tests myself using Gluster client and NFS and NFS got better performance 
also and I believe this is due the caching.

Fernando

-----Original Message-----
From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org 
[mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] On Behalf Of Stephan von Krawczynski
Sent: 10 September 2012 13:57
To: Whit Blauvelt
Cc: gluster-users@gluster.org; Brian Candler
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Throughout over infiniband

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:06:51 -0400
Whit Blauvelt <whit.glus...@transpect.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > [...]
> > If you're lucky you reach something like 1/3 of the NFS performance.
> [Gluster NFS Client]
> Whit

There is a reason why one would switch from NFS to GlusterFS, and mostly it is 
redundancy. If you start using a NFS-client type you cut yourself off the 
"complete solution". As said elsewhere you can as well export GlusterFS via 
kernel-nfs-server. But honestly, it is a patch. It would be better by far if 
things are done right, native glusterfs client in kernel-space.
And remember, generally there should be no big difference between NFS and 
GlusterFS with bricks spread over several networks - if it is done how it 
should be, without userspace.

--
MfG,
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

Reply via email to