if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.
2016年11月17日星期四，jin deng <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> 写道： > > > 2016年11月17日星期四，李立 <[email protected]> 写道： > >> In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different >> bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data >> will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to >> avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable. >> > > I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which > inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht) > instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates > the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your > purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion. > > > -- > Thanks, > DengJin > > -- Thanks, DengJin
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
