Thanks for your reply ! I have many data folders such as data1,data2... and
this data folders contains some files. The data will be disable if one files
missed. I use distributed volume storage the data folders and the files of data
folder is distributed to all bricks. The all data folders will be disable if
one brick down. I think out the distributed replica volume,but disk utilization
is less than 50% whth replica volume.I can put up with some data missing ,but
I cann't tolerate all data being disable. So,I want the data folder storage
just one brick,so that ,if one brick down , it has some data folder disable in
this brick and other data is well.
Thanks,
LiLi
------------------
----------------------????
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "jin deng"<[email protected]>;
????????: 2016??11??17??(??????) ????4:13
??????: "????"<[email protected]>;
????: "gluster-users"<[email protected]>;
????: [Gluster-users] How to distributed with a folder
if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data
unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.
2016??11??17??????????jin deng <[email protected]> ??????
2016??11??17?????????????? <[email protected]> ??????
In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different bricks.But,my
data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data will be disabled.So,
I want a specific folder will be store one brick to avoid dropping a brick and
all data is disable.
I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which inside
one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht) instead of
letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates the model of
"distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your purpose.Maybe someone
will give a different opinion.
--
Thanks,DengJin
--
Thanks,DengJin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
