On 03/07/18 14:47, Jim Kinney wrote:
[snip].
The gluster-fuse client works but is slower than most people like. I
use the fuse process in my setup at work. ...
Depending on the use case and configuration. With client-side caching
and cache invalidation, a good number of the performance complaints can
be addressed in a similar (better) way to how nfs makes things fast.
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 14:50 -0500, Ben Mason wrote:
Hello,
I'm designing a 2-node, HA NAS that must support NFS. I had planned
on using GlusterFS native NFS until I saw that it is being
deprecated. Then, I was going to use GlusterFS + NFS-Ganesha until I
saw that the Ganesha HA support ended after 3.10 and its replacement
is still a WIP. So, I landed on GlusterFS + kernel NFS + corosync &
pacemaker, which seems to work quite well. Are there any performance
issues or other concerns with using GlusterFS as a replication layer
and kernel NFS on top of that?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org>
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
James P. Kinney III
Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
- Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
